Folks:
Suppose you were in on a plant.
The box disappeared.
The planter carved a new stamp and hid the box in a slightly
different location.
You were not in on the plant this time.
If you find the box this time, can you count it as a Find?
Just a debated question between me and JugglerMouse,
Sir Balthazar of 100**100D
Question on Counts
2 messages in this thread |
Started on 2003-05-29
Question on Counts
From: Sir Balthazar (neovolatile@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2003-05-29 22:09:55 UTC
Re: [LbNA] Question on Counts
From: Chuck Straub (woodschuckstraub@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2003-05-29 19:25:03 UTC-07:00
First: There are no rules but.....My opinion is that it takes a new stamp, new clues and a new log book to make a new box. If it has all three, and you don't also count it as a plant, it can be a find......Chuck and Molly P77 F419 X125
Sir Balthazar wrote:Folks:
Suppose you were in on a plant.
The box disappeared.
The planter carved a new stamp and hid the box in a slightly
different location.
You were not in on the plant this time.
If you find the box this time, can you count it as a Find?
Just a debated question between me and JugglerMouse,
Sir Balthazar of 100**100D
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sir Balthazar
Suppose you were in on a plant.
The box disappeared.
The planter carved a new stamp and hid the box in a slightly
different location.
You were not in on the plant this time.
If you find the box this time, can you count it as a Find?
Just a debated question between me and JugglerMouse,
Sir Balthazar of 100**100D
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]